I tried it and I find it easier to work with Caveman2. I didn't
realise this templating program is built around Hunchentoot -- whereas
Caveman2 builds on top of. So, I'm moving the code to back to Caveman2
-- where I originally started. It looks like a waste of time but the
knowledge of having a look at the other stuff has been helpful.
This script adds a user to the database based on it's inputs (prompted
for the person running the script). The intention is to add a user to
the database easier (especially on a live production server with just
the CLI).
https://github.com/vindarel/cl-cookieweb (for GitHub Repo. and
instructions).
The reason for using this is because it makes it easier to run the
website as a standalone thing. You don't need to link it up to
Quicklisp's /local-project directory. It has scripts to help you build
the binaries and to run the website (as a standalone) thing. I, also,
hadn't use this 'cookie cutter' program before so it's a good time to
get my feet wet.
The admin. backend for Django isn't as easy to get to where I want it,
compared to Caveman2. The trade-off is Common Lisp isn't a mainstream
language so it does reduce the level of ease other might have when/if
they join the project.
I'm going to try this with Python and Django first. Because it's not
my personal project, it might be better to use a language which is
more mainstream. It should reduce the 'Bus Factor'.